Biden Offers Companies Millions to Reduce Dependency on Russia’s Key Resource
The Biden administration unveiled a revolutionary new strategy to substitute coal and reestablish competition with Russia and China over a technology that was initially developed by American scientists at the global climate summit held in Dubai last month.
Alongside almost two dozen other countries, the United States led the commitment to triple the global nuclear energy supply by 2050. Although most reactors currently under construction in other nations are Russian models, the United States advocated for its expanding portfolio of high-tech firms that develop state-of-the-art reactor designs as an alternative to collaborating with the Kremlin.
Where is the major flaw in that pitch? Small, next-generation nuclear reactors, such as the one backed by billionaire Bill Gates, are engineered to operate on a scarce but potent variety of uranium fuel that is commercially available only from the Russian government.
The inaugural domestic production of high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU), which is pronounced HAY-loo, commenced in Ohio from the previous autumn. It remains, however, on a modest scale.
Presently, the Biden administration is endeavoring to attract additional firms to the market.
The Department of Energy on Tuesday extended a minimum offer of $2 million per private company to commence domestic production of HALEU. This represents the second installment of $500 million in federal funding designated for nuclear fuel production, which was allocated through President Joe Biden’s climate-spending legislation known as the Inflation Reduction Act.
In November, the agency disclosed the initial installment for a distinct phase of the HALEU development process.
Ali Zaidi, Biden’s national climate adviser, said in a statement, “Increasing our domestic uranium supply will not only help us achieve our historic climate agenda, but it will also bolster America’s energy security, generate well-paying union jobs, and enhance our economic competitiveness.”
Ali Zaidi, Biden’s national climate adviser, lauded the most recent funding for HALEU production as a crucial stage in the reconstruction of the domestic nuclear energy supply chain in the United States.
Presently, all 93 atom-splitting machines in operation at power plants in the United States are conventional light-water reactors. These reactors utilize technology that was initially commercialized in the 1950s to convert the enormous heat produced by fission reactions into steam, which then drives turbines to produce vast quantities of nonstop zero-carbon electricity.
Fuel for light-water reactors can only consist of uranium that has been enriched by up to 5% through the use of high-speed gas centrifuges into the unstable uranium-235 isotope, which is essential for sustaining a fission reaction.
A considerable number of “advanced” reactors presently competing for regulatory authorization in the United States are specifically engineered to process fuel enriched by as much as 20%. Consequently, this technology consumes four times the energy per unit of uranium as its conventional counterpart.
Although the United States and its allies imposed unprecedented sanctions on Russian oil, gas, and mining companies in retaliation for the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Moscow’s state-owned Rosatom, the fourth-largest importer of traditional fuels for American utilities, remains exempt.
That could possibly change forever. A month ago, the House of Representatives, which is controlled by the Republicans, passed legislation urging the United States to prohibit imports of Russian uranium.
America once manufactured the majority of its own reactor fuel. A Clinton-era agreement in the 1990s urged the post-Soviet Union’s failing Russia to dismantle its nuclear arsenal; in exchange, the United States agreed to purchase any reactor fuel produced from weapons. U.S. enrichers ceased operations due to the inexpensive petroleum supplied by Russia; the final facility ceased operations a decade ago.
Utilized nuclear fuels discarded from reactors owned by French, European, and Asian electrical corporations are the specialty of the La Hague facility. For secure containment, the treatment entails separating and packaging the various components, separating recyclable fuels (such as plutonium and uranium) from non-recyclable components (which contain the majority of the radioactivity).
The United States government feared that the complex process of recycling nuclear waste would increase the supply of radioactive materials for weapons in the 1970s, thereby prohibiting the establishment of the nation’s first nuclear waste recycling facility.
Revitalizing Nuclear Recycling
France, Russia, and Japan have all constructed uranium fuel reprocessing facilities. Since 2005, when the United States lifted its prohibition on nuclear recycling, no company has attempted to construct a new facility in earnest.
The provision of new financing for HALEU production by the IRA legislation did not encompass the recycling of nuclear waste.
Page 8 of the draft letter accompanying the Energy Department’s most recent request for proposals concerning the enrichment of HALEU specifies that the uranium utilized in the fuel’s production “must have undergone mining and conversion, rather than originate from a recycled or reprocessed source.”
Tuesday via telephone, McGinnis stated, “Some individuals are oblivious to the fact that recycling could be one of the two solid pillars of our future domestic nuclear fuel production capability, despite our insistence that HALEU support be supported.”
The primary federal initiative to finance nuclear waste recycling is the experimental ARPA-E program of the Energy Department, which awarded $38 million to laboratories and companies for research in 2022, including $5 million to Curio.
The chairman of the House appropriations subcommittee on water and energy, Representative Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.), added $15 million to the most recent federal budget proposal for reprocessing uranium fuel in order to assist companies in moving from the research phase to licensing and locating a physical plant.
At least fifteen years ago, according to McGinnis, the United States never even contemplated spending that amount of money to implement nuclear waste recycling. He urged the White House and Senate to support the measure during budget negotiations.
“You are not only supplementing conventional uranium mining, but you are also substantially resolving the nuclear waste problem by extracting from our so-called nuclear waste,” he explained. “The situation is win-win.”
Read more: $100m Settlement Awarded To Family In 2018 Grand Canyon Helicopter Tragedy
